Skip to main content

"The Intelligent Universe" is the name of my coming book/ paper on the subject of our coded universe.

\Yes we live in an intelligent universe. It is easy to prove.  Not sure if that proves the existence of God or anything else but it does prove that where there is coded transmission there has to be intelligence.  Coding begins with assigning values to  phenomenology.  we humans often like to use schematic symbols to transmit ideas and messages as code. we assign shapes  values and try to make  the whole process systematic and predictable.  nature's code , having now gone way beyond 'laws of nature" to having a periodic table and an electro magnetic spectrum, DNA and other coding as in different levels of DNA coding when the DNA becomes activated in vitro tells us that we humans did not invent the codes but just happened to discover it and continue to try and decipher it as best we can.      
The way an intelligent universe works maybe for more types and levels of intelligence to exist than we humans want to imagine possible. we want to feel blessed and conceded with our consciousness. the entire universe maybe conscious as much or more than we are.  Atoms know which crystals to join when crystals are forming.  They can avoid becoming part of one crystal and instead become part of another.  plants may grow toward the light but no one thinks that's a form of innate intelligence except for me.    Why would it be intelligence?  It is just reacting.?  No it is reacting in as predictable way  instead of  we could say an "unintelligent way".....I can explain but it might take a whole darn book to do so.  Chemical reactions may not all be intelligent as it might take trillions of trillions times trillions of trillions of reactions for the accident that makes life possible on earth to happen anywhere else in the universe and everywhere else. In a universe with astronomical distances and time then there is plenty of time for all that and more to happen.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Space Time is Nonsense in a universe where space has no actual metric properties. Einstein Got it Wrong . Super Relativity by Lex Loeb resolves the problem.

You have to read a lot of my previous posts to understand my empirical discoveries.  Figuring you have I will now quickly explain how mass relates to gravity and probably electromagnetic properties of mater too. Newton clearly stated that object in motion stay in motion but never really explained , relative, to everything else in the universe , as a marker or a metric in space, how any object 'stays at rest.'   Relative to all  other objects moving in space or even photons at the speed of light,  Everything is actually in motion . Nothing is at rest. Well of course you know that intuitively.  The whole mental experiment by Einstein about frames of reference is about things being in motion relative to each other and that also includes his diversion into space and time and space time. Object in space regardless of size or whether they are mater or photons or something else that has physical subatomic particles of any sort or size is that they only can register against each
Post a Comment
Read more

Assuming em drive propulsion is a real phenomenon...assuming....you should be able to instantly propell your microwave oven into orbit after unplugging it.

My new understanding of light and the spectrum of light as being pure code and not transmitting energy nor mass perfectly supports the observation that seem to say an em drive engine is possible.    That's because you create and send a photon to transmit information  which we all know are the "wavelength / frequency" for each.  at opposite ends of the spectrum you should then have pure wavelength with no frequency and pure frequency with no wavelength at the other end of the spectrum.  What is pure frequency? what is pure wavelength.  these are both properties expressed as analogies.  at one end of the spectrum I would guess you have pure acceleration and at the other  negative acceleration ?   the basic positive photon just finds energy of existing momentum of mater and subatomic particles and deploys it.  It becomes a frames of reference mater when a gamma ray seems to activate a sub atomic particle when it really is just deactivating it essentially slowing it down rela
Post a Comment
Read more

Proving Electrons Have No Mass as they are really code processors that allows them to signal properties mass only

The massless electron is definite now. The best way to explain the new science is to use the word either . but it is not either that covers the entire universe it is a proton nucleus either that only covers the extent of electron attraction / counter balancing. electrons are as mass free as photons how ever they do have your basic thermodynamic properties. As photons are pure code electrons are electrons are acting more like computers. They process photonic code. The next step will totally blow away physics as we now know it. Not sure if relativity suffers yet...   I am still resolving the mass free electron thesis.   Electrons have no mass . They are essentially code processors that signal properties of mass in the pervasive sea of electromagnetism that pervades the universe.  I now know that there is a sort of electro magnetic weather though out the entire universe...it  blips and pulses and has fronts just like weather systems. electrons are the intersection of mater and elect
Post a Comment
Read more