Skip to main content

How Photons lead to Lex Loeb's "Super Relativity"


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Super Relativity And The Bowling Ball That Flies Though The Back Window Of A Speeding Automobile.

 Super Relativity is real.  Real Physics.  It is all My discovery.  So you think you have never seen a bowling ball flying through the back window of a speeding Automobile.  I say you have and often. When you See that powerful laser light cutting through solid metal it may seem to be burning a hole through the material, in reality, it is acting to cause bowling balls to fly through the back window of a speeding car.  With the photoelectric effect, you see electric current flowing from wires with exposure to light.  Again it is Super Relativity with bowling balls flying through the back window of a speeding car because photons slow down certain subatomic particles they do not enrich them with energy in transmission of any kind. So you are standing on an Asteroid in deep dark space. You like the little prince have might have no idea and no sensation that you are moving 800 meters per second relative to some other invisible point in space.  You may b...

What if the speed of light constant is wrong and light can travel instantly under some circumstances from end to end of the entire cosmos?

The speed of light constant actually might not be!  It maybe possible for light to travel instantly . The speed of light constant is the measured rate it travels in a vacuum   and then what if it does not travel in a vacuum?  Yes I am serious because so called quantum mechanics experiments say that particles can be in more than one place at the same time.  We can measure light speed in the time it takes from one point in or beyond or solar system and predict it exactly but our solar system is not the greater universe and  we still actually can't measure light we don't find reflected off an object or that we have generated ourselves...…….when light comes out of the sun or a distant sun or galaxy we really don't know it's point to time origins.  we did not create it so we can only estimate it and we cannot tag it unless we send it at a signature wavelength/frequency so of course I am right.  But I have to prove that although we are certain it takes ...

AN EXTREME EXAMPLE of EXTRAPOLATION EXPLOITATION / EXPTRAPOLATION FALLACY.

IT IS what I call an extrapolation fallacy. NOT to mention bad science. What they are really doing is watching cars in the distance on the high way getting smaller and smaller in the distance and assuming that as their car moves forward it will also continue to get infinitely smaller too. I figured out their mistake about a month ago . A good reason to keep mathematicians away from empirical sciences. https://www.msn.com/…/the-universe-seems-to-be-…/ar-BBWibnh… |2