Gravity Research Program --GRP

Gravity Research Program --GRP
Click Picture For Link To Gravity Research Homepage

Thursday, July 12, 2018

Gravity really is a form of electromagnetism It is something like an analogy to a revved up fly wheel but has nothing to do with spinning nor with spherical planetary characteristics . though certainly related, It still follows what Newton discovered where F=MA. MASS IN MOTION explains it all . an object in motion stays in motion as Newton observed unless something comes and interacts with it. Gravity is a form of interaction between objects in motion. but it is just one type of interaction between objects. objects can collide or they can experience gravity. the difference between collisions and gravity is that that momentum is turned inward within the object itself and that is because not all subatomic particles share the same momentum some drag behind. that revs mass up like a fly wheel and causes code generation.

Thursday, April 26, 2018

reverse to impart latent momentum...

 My physics research is moving forward fast or maybe backwards because first latent energy of momentum is what photons derive point to point electromagnetic disturbances from.  Backwards than emitting a photon or re-emiting a photon then contributes back again to the the net reserve of latent momentum.  That only because of coding phenomenology since no energy what so ever is transmitted.  So why code and what is code?  That question is going to have an answer that will make quantum mechanics obsolete. Our code is linguistic, communicates ...but code gets sent all the time that no one can interpret unless they have the key to the code or 'break" the code to uncover it or discover it.   So what is code then? some say information.  I say directive probability . Or just probability.  the more information revealed the more meaning we say the code transmitted.  photons don't transmit meaning.  code never transmits meaning.  go to computer code of binary ones and zeros.  It looks like 111000010010100010011101111101010100010....and that may represent something or might not.   representations of electro magnetism over time and space...ah that's what it is...though it always requires a material interface for reactions to read it.....organisms with senses can sometimes to that but inorganic material can also follow the directions implied by photonic code.  Its coding for electromagnetism.

Wednesday, April 11, 2018

Proving Electrons Have No Mass as they are really code processors that allows them to signal properties mass only

The massless electron is definite now. The best way to explain the new science is to use the word either . but it is not either that covers the entire universe it is a proton nucleus either that only covers the extent of electron attraction / counter balancing. electrons are as mass free as photons how ever they do have your basic thermodynamic properties. As photons are pure code electrons are electrons are acting more like computers. They process photonic code. The next step will totally blow away physics as we now know it. Not sure if relativity suffers yet...

  I am still resolving the mass free electron thesis.   Electrons have no mass . They are essentially code processors that signal properties of mass in the pervasive sea of electromagnetism that pervades the universe.  I now know that there is a sort of electro magnetic weather though out the entire universe...it  blips and pulses and has fronts just like weather systems. electrons are the intersection of mater and electromagnetism.  they are just code  processors. The nuclear atom also processes code but it should be a by product of electron code processing coming first.  The new physics now says there are parts of the cosmos with almost no electro magnetism and other parts that are highly enriched. you can look at the solar system we live in and see the most electromagnetic activity at the sun and then it fades with distance out away from the sun. Then there are brighter electromagnetic planets like the earth having its field and mars having almost none...so far far away we can figure there are areas of absolute zero temperatures with virtually no electro magnetism.  that may lead to what dark mater would have to be and / or what so  called dark energy is....it is lacking electromagnetism or just being less than elsewhere which if you could read astronomy photographs using it makes more sense of things.

Wednesday, August 30, 2017

Assuming em drive propulsion is a real phenomenon...assuming....you should be able to instantly propell your microwave oven into orbit after unplugging it.

My new understanding of light and the spectrum of light as being pure code and not transmitting energy nor mass perfectly supports the observation that seem to say an em drive engine is possible.    That's because you create and send a photon to transmit information  which we all know are the "wavelength / frequency" for each.  at opposite ends of the spectrum you should then have pure wavelength with no frequency and pure frequency with no wavelength at the other end of the spectrum.  What is pure frequency? what is pure wavelength.  these are both properties expressed as analogies.  at one end of the spectrum I would guess you have pure acceleration and at the other  negative acceleration ?   the basic positive photon just finds energy of existing momentum of mater and subatomic particles and deploys it.  It becomes a frames of reference mater when a gamma ray seems to activate a sub atomic particle when it really is just deactivating it essentially slowing it down relative to the rest of the mater it is connected to.  So then theoretically you can send a signal that totally stop mater in it's tracks and it won't necessarily take huge energy levels to achieve.  That could essentially take the  microwave off the earth's surface immediately because its atoms are no longer in sync with the rest of mater on earth. If it can fly off by completely stopping it by slowing it down hundreds of thousands of meters per second than you get a full effect of disengaging.  at the opposite end of the spectrum you can instantly increase it's momentum possibly though less likely.

https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/227146-a-new-theory-of-inertia-could-explain-the-em-drives-anomalous-thrust

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

I have long been saying photons act backwards as they do not impart any force or momentum on objects they react with. Instead photons do what is the opposite and it leads to a tiny reaction more like gravity or incremental gravity.

There is no force of light that's because photons act as if backwards or anti particles.  a collision with a photon is not a release of energy in some kind of crash but rather a coded message to release energy from underlying momentum of mass by slowing down the subatomic particles involved rather speeding them up.....slowing them down or making them come to a stop probably with some more energetic gamma rays.  unlike a passenger being thrown though a window because a car comes to an unexpected stop when the passenger is unrestrained with seat belts  but rather is like a bowling ball in the back seat of the car falling out the back window because the bowling ball comes to a stop when it comes to a stop and the car keeps moving forward. The temptation is to say that is something coming to a stop because of a collision but that is not how it works.  It is just updated relativism that accounts for it.  The mysterioius dark energy of momentum is  definitely there and variable.  black body radiation gravity effect has everything to do with this...it is incremental gravity....that's why tiny asteroids can collect a lot of fine dust and retain rubble as they travel in space far more than possible because of gravity calculated from their small masses.  The code is acting on unseen energy not on the material directly.  https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/e0b5aa96-e5f8-3a8e-83a9-3a1a0c96bd0f/ss_quantum-mechanical-particles.html

Monday, July 17, 2017

More Proof that Photons are Pure Code Have No Mass and Don't Actually Transmit Energy Found by studying Alternating Current.

When electric current is transmitted though time and space using a wire it is wrong to believe the electrons from the source generator are actually buzzing at or near the speed of light along the outside of the conducting wire .  What is really happening is the generator is producing an electrical disturbance with what I have been calling dark photons which are code moving form electron to electron along the conducting wire.  As code these dark or embedded photons that are not radiating out into space but going from atom to atom via the electrons send a message from one to the next which are conveyed to the point of energy use and then in a transformed state back to the source as a different code.  in Transit there is radiation because of resistance.    This resistance is a sort of subatomic collision that rather than transmitting energy finds it in the state of underlying momentum and that leads to photon radiation or "light photons' coming off.  Direct current is more successful at causing this radiation effect where as alternating currency has less loss of "power" over the transmission lines at a distance.  The reason why supports the pure code thesis for photons because it very well can be that alternating current rolls the electrons effectively canceling out those collisions thus preventing more radiation from occurring.  It helps to visualize one code neutralizing the other with alternating current where the two opposite code instructions neutralize what would be a collision force in direct current.  The pure code photonic thesis solves the mystery of why alternating current has the advantages over long distances that it does over direct current.  Pure code and a cancelation process explains  it.

It seems difficult to believe that underlying momentum has anything to do with energy originating from an electric generator that is until you start looking and seeing the actual physical  means of producing that electric current.  Start with your hydro electric dam with it's very large generators that rotate very fast because water causes huge turbines to spin as it falls  over the dam into a spillway that rotates the turbines.    The turbine causes magnets and wound up copper wire to spin with some resistance to the force of the magnetic field with in.  The power of the spinning is equivalent to the work being done and close to that of the value of the electric being  generated for transmission.  A generator is not easy work to spin.  Its resistance to spinning has a lot to do with the transmission of energy. If you have a hand held crank generator you don't just spin the wheel effortlessly but have to experience its  resisting your spinning it.  Does that send code down the wire or a stream of electrons?  as stated above electrons would rather stay closer to their home atoms than stream down the exterior of a conducting wire.  how is that wheel spinning and does it have any relationship  to the net motion of the earth in the solar system/galaxy/ universe.  You have to think frames of reference to get how it happens.    We don't feel like we are moving with the earth at over 800,000 meters per second until we crash into something say possibly a cosmic ray coming from the opposite direction at a rate of velocity or greater.  We don't think of the earth as a sort of bullet moving fast enough to vaporize something  of equivalent size that it crashes into at that rate of velocity.  Sub atomic particles  experience that sort of thing directly their frames of reference are not the same as ours.  What appears to us as stasis seems to them as a full collision. The velocity of the earth against the backdrop of the rest of the universe for electrons and other subatomic parts leave them at a potential energy  level like water standing in a reservoir above a dam.  That water above the dam relates to the generator with its turbines waiting for the water to fall and move the turbine.  Frame of reference disparity can account for whats not easily apparent.

Sunday, July 16, 2017

Electron current is a signal not much of a stream of electrons actually moving large distances. When lightening strikes you are seeing resistance not current so much.

So there are yet to be discovered new ways to transmit electric current neither AC nor DC. I think this notion of electrons traveling with DC is wrong. It is the electromagnetic coding that travels not the actual electrons in either AC or DC. DC may just be rotational where the electrons roll one after another instead of popping out a photon at intervals along the current line. What it means is that photon retention is the difference not the result or that AC is just more efficient at long term transmission because the rolling of electrons prevents radiation of photons that DC is in -able to do. Therefore it is possible to transmit electricity even more efficiently by generating a new kind of current that rolls electrons in a different manner. I am wondering if anyone ever has tagged specific electrons to see if they ever actually travel any substantial distance. clearly electrons are free and interchangeable with higher conductivity metals but at the speed of light they still may only move down the line a few positions. its resistance that causes electrons to jump out of the line and radiates photons. Resistance says collision to me and that means the energy can easily come from underlying momentum not from necessarily as direct energy.
"The bigger appliances in your home use a different kind of electricity called alternating current (AC). Instead of always flowing the same way, the electrons constantly reverse direction—about 50–60 times every second. Although you might think that makes it impossible for energy to be carried round a circuit, it doesn't! Take the flashlight bulb in the circuit above. With direct current, new electrons keep streaming through the filament (a thin piece of wire inside the bulb), making it heat up and give off light. With alternating current, the same old electrons whiz back and forth in the filament. You can think of them running on the spot, heating up the filament so it still makes bright light we can see. So both types of current can make the lamp work even though they flow in different ways. Most other electric appliances can also work using either direct or alternating current, though some circuits do need AC to be changed to DC (or vice versa) to work correctly".