Skip to main content


What if the speed of light constant is wrong and light can travel instantly under some circumstances from end to end of the entire cosmos?

The speed of light constant actually might not be!  It maybe possible for light to travel instantly . The speed of light constant is the measured rate it travels in a vacuum   and then what if it does not travel in a vacuum?  Yes I am serious because so called quantum mechanics experiments say that particles can be in more than one place at the same time.  We can measure light speed in the time it takes from one point in or beyond or solar system and predict it exactly but our solar system is not the greater universe and  we still actually can't measure light we don't find reflected off an object or that we have generated ourselves...…….when light comes out of the sun or a distant sun or galaxy we really don't know it's point to time origins.  we did not create it so we can only estimate it and we cannot tag it unless we send it at a signature wavelength/frequency so of course I am right.  But I have to prove that although we are certain it takes x number of minutes to
Recent posts


IT IS what I call an extrapolation fallacy. NOT to mention bad science. What they are really doing is watching cars in the distance on the high way getting smaller and smaller in the distance and assuming that as their car moves forward it will also continue to get infinitely smaller too. I figured out their mistake about a month ago . A good reason to keep mathematicians away from empirical sciences.…/the-universe-seems-to-be-…/ar-BBWibnh… |2

Space Time is Nonsense in a universe where space has no actual metric properties. Einstein Got it Wrong . Super Relativity by Lex Loeb resolves the problem.

You have to read a lot of my previous posts to understand my empirical discoveries.  Figuring you have I will now quickly explain how mass relates to gravity and probably electromagnetic properties of mater too. Newton clearly stated that object in motion stay in motion but never really explained , relative, to everything else in the universe , as a marker or a metric in space, how any object 'stays at rest.'   Relative to all  other objects moving in space or even photons at the speed of light,  Everything is actually in motion . Nothing is at rest. Well of course you know that intuitively.  The whole mental experiment by Einstein about frames of reference is about things being in motion relative to each other and that also includes his diversion into space and time and space time. Object in space regardless of size or whether they are mater or photons or something else that has physical subatomic particles of any sort or size is that they only can register against each

How Photons lead to Lex Loeb's "Super Relativity"

Lex Loeb Just now · Gravity really is a form of electromagnetism It is something like an analogy to a revved up fly wheel but has nothing to do with spinning nor with spherical planetary characteristics . though certainly related, It still follows what Newton discovered where F=MA. MASS IN MOTION explains it all . an object in motion stays in motion as Newton observed unless something comes and interacts with it. Gravity is a form of interaction between objects in motion. but it is just one type of interaction between objects. objects can collide or they can experience gravity. the difference between collisions and gravity is that that momentum is turned inward within the object itself and that is because not all subatomic particles share the same momentum some drag behind. that revs mass up like a fly wheel and causes code generation.

reverse to impart latent momentum...

 My physics research is moving forward fast or maybe backwards because first latent energy of momentum is what photons derive point to point electromagnetic disturbances from.  Backwards than emitting a photon or re-emiting a photon then contributes back again to the the net reserve of latent momentum.  That only because of coding phenomenology since no energy what so ever is transmitted.  So why code and what is code?  That question is going to have an answer that will make quantum mechanics obsolete. Our code is linguistic, communicates ...but code gets sent all the time that no one can interpret unless they have the key to the code or 'break" the code to uncover it or discover it.   So what is code then? some say information.  I say directive probability . Or just probability.  the more information revealed the more meaning we say the code transmitted.  photons don't transmit meaning.  code never transmits meaning.  go to computer code of binary ones and zeros.  It look

Proving Electrons Have No Mass as they are really code processors that allows them to signal properties mass only

The massless electron is definite now. The best way to explain the new science is to use the word either . but it is not either that covers the entire universe it is a proton nucleus either that only covers the extent of electron attraction / counter balancing. electrons are as mass free as photons how ever they do have your basic thermodynamic properties. As photons are pure code electrons are electrons are acting more like computers. They process photonic code. The next step will totally blow away physics as we now know it. Not sure if relativity suffers yet...   I am still resolving the mass free electron thesis.   Electrons have no mass . They are essentially code processors that signal properties of mass in the pervasive sea of electromagnetism that pervades the universe.  I now know that there is a sort of electro magnetic weather though out the entire  blips and pulses and has fronts just like weather systems. electrons are the intersection of mater and elect