Gravity Research Program --GRP

Gravity Research Program --GRP
Click Picture For Link To Gravity Research Homepage

Wednesday, August 30, 2017

Assuming em drive propulsion is a real phenomenon...assuming....you should be able to instantly propell your microwave oven into orbit after unplugging it.

My new understanding of light and the spectrum of light as being pure code and not transmitting energy nor mass perfectly supports the observation that seem to say an em drive engine is possible.    That's because you create and send a photon to transmit information  which we all know are the "wavelength / frequency" for each.  at opposite ends of the spectrum you should then have pure wavelength with no frequency and pure frequency with no wavelength at the other end of the spectrum.  What is pure frequency? what is pure wavelength.  these are both properties expressed as analogies.  at one end of the spectrum I would guess you have pure acceleration and at the other  negative acceleration ?   the basic positive photon just finds energy of existing momentum of mater and subatomic particles and deploys it.  It becomes a frames of reference mater when a gamma ray seems to activate a sub atomic particle when it really is just deactivating it essentially slowing it down relative to the rest of the mater it is connected to.  So then theoretically you can send a signal that totally stop mater in it's tracks and it won't necessarily take huge energy levels to achieve.  That could essentially take the  microwave off the earth's surface immediately because its atoms are no longer in sync with the rest of mater on earth. If it can fly off by completely stopping it by slowing it down hundreds of thousands of meters per second than you get a full effect of disengaging.  at the opposite end of the spectrum you can instantly increase it's momentum possibly though less likely.

https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/227146-a-new-theory-of-inertia-could-explain-the-em-drives-anomalous-thrust

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

I have long been saying photons act backwards as they do not impart any force or momentum on objects they react with. Instead photons do what is the opposite and it leads to a tiny reaction more like gravity or incremental gravity.

There is no force of light that's because photons act as if backwards or anti particles.  a collision with a photon is not a release of energy in some kind of crash but rather a coded message to release energy from underlying momentum of mass by slowing down the subatomic particles involved rather speeding them up.....slowing them down or making them come to a stop probably with some more energetic gamma rays.  unlike a passenger being thrown though a window because a car comes to an unexpected stop when the passenger is unrestrained with seat belts  but rather is like a bowling ball in the back seat of the car falling out the back window because the bowling ball comes to a stop when it comes to a stop and the car keeps moving forward. The temptation is to say that is something coming to a stop because of a collision but that is not how it works.  It is just updated relativism that accounts for it.  The mysterioius dark energy of momentum is  definitely there and variable.  black body radiation gravity effect has everything to do with this...it is incremental gravity....that's why tiny asteroids can collect a lot of fine dust and retain rubble as they travel in space far more than possible because of gravity calculated from their small masses.  The code is acting on unseen energy not on the material directly.  https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/e0b5aa96-e5f8-3a8e-83a9-3a1a0c96bd0f/ss_quantum-mechanical-particles.html

Monday, July 17, 2017

More Proof that Photons are Pure Code Have No Mass and Don't Actually Transmit Energy Found by studying Alternating Current.

When electric current is transmitted though time and space using a wire it is wrong to believe the electrons from the source generator are actually buzzing at or near the speed of light along the outside of the conducting wire .  What is really happening is the generator is producing an electrical disturbance with what I have been calling dark photons which are code moving form electron to electron along the conducting wire.  As code these dark or embedded photons that are not radiating out into space but going from atom to atom via the electrons send a message from one to the next which are conveyed to the point of energy use and then in a transformed state back to the source as a different code.  in Transit there is radiation because of resistance.    This resistance is a sort of subatomic collision that rather than transmitting energy finds it in the state of underlying momentum and that leads to photon radiation or "light photons' coming off.  Direct current is more successful at causing this radiation effect where as alternating currency has less loss of "power" over the transmission lines at a distance.  The reason why supports the pure code thesis for photons because it very well can be that alternating current rolls the electrons effectively canceling out those collisions thus preventing more radiation from occurring.  It helps to visualize one code neutralizing the other with alternating current where the two opposite code instructions neutralize what would be a collision force in direct current.  The pure code photonic thesis solves the mystery of why alternating current has the advantages over long distances that it does over direct current.  Pure code and a cancelation process explains  it.

It seems difficult to believe that underlying momentum has anything to do with energy originating from an electric generator that is until you start looking and seeing the actual physical  means of producing that electric current.  Start with your hydro electric dam with it's very large generators that rotate very fast because water causes huge turbines to spin as it falls  over the dam into a spillway that rotates the turbines.    The turbine causes magnets and wound up copper wire to spin with some resistance to the force of the magnetic field with in.  The power of the spinning is equivalent to the work being done and close to that of the value of the electric being  generated for transmission.  A generator is not easy work to spin.  Its resistance to spinning has a lot to do with the transmission of energy. If you have a hand held crank generator you don't just spin the wheel effortlessly but have to experience its  resisting your spinning it.  Does that send code down the wire or a stream of electrons?  as stated above electrons would rather stay closer to their home atoms than stream down the exterior of a conducting wire.  how is that wheel spinning and does it have any relationship  to the net motion of the earth in the solar system/galaxy/ universe.  You have to think frames of reference to get how it happens.    We don't feel like we are moving with the earth at over 800,000 meters per second until we crash into something say possibly a cosmic ray coming from the opposite direction at a rate of velocity or greater.  We don't think of the earth as a sort of bullet moving fast enough to vaporize something  of equivalent size that it crashes into at that rate of velocity.  Sub atomic particles  experience that sort of thing directly their frames of reference are not the same as ours.  What appears to us as stasis seems to them as a full collision. The velocity of the earth against the backdrop of the rest of the universe for electrons and other subatomic parts leave them at a potential energy  level like water standing in a reservoir above a dam.  That water above the dam relates to the generator with its turbines waiting for the water to fall and move the turbine.  Frame of reference disparity can account for whats not easily apparent.

Sunday, July 16, 2017

Electron current is a signal not much of a stream of electrons actually moving large distances. When lightening strikes you are seeing resistance not current so much.

So there are yet to be discovered new ways to transmit electric current neither AC nor DC. I think this notion of electrons traveling with DC is wrong. It is the electromagnetic coding that travels not the actual electrons in either AC or DC. DC may just be rotational where the electrons roll one after another instead of popping out a photon at intervals along the current line. What it means is that photon retention is the difference not the result or that AC is just more efficient at long term transmission because the rolling of electrons prevents radiation of photons that DC is in -able to do. Therefore it is possible to transmit electricity even more efficiently by generating a new kind of current that rolls electrons in a different manner. I am wondering if anyone ever has tagged specific electrons to see if they ever actually travel any substantial distance. clearly electrons are free and interchangeable with higher conductivity metals but at the speed of light they still may only move down the line a few positions. its resistance that causes electrons to jump out of the line and radiates photons. Resistance says collision to me and that means the energy can easily come from underlying momentum not from necessarily as direct energy.
"The bigger appliances in your home use a different kind of electricity called alternating current (AC). Instead of always flowing the same way, the electrons constantly reverse direction—about 50–60 times every second. Although you might think that makes it impossible for energy to be carried round a circuit, it doesn't! Take the flashlight bulb in the circuit above. With direct current, new electrons keep streaming through the filament (a thin piece of wire inside the bulb), making it heat up and give off light. With alternating current, the same old electrons whiz back and forth in the filament. You can think of them running on the spot, heating up the filament so it still makes bright light we can see. So both types of current can make the lamp work even though they flow in different ways. Most other electric appliances can also work using either direct or alternating current, though some circuits do need AC to be changed to DC (or vice versa) to work correctly".

Wednesday, June 28, 2017

The process of electroysis where oxygen and hydrogen are separately released from water along the lines of separate charged leads is key to the proof that photons carry no mass and no energy.

somewhere along the line readers may have missed this point.  its way back in the discovery blog.  The way oxygen and hydrogen can separate from water molecules and  emerge along separate lines of polarity in a current should be one of the greatest mysteries of science. it is practically quantum mechanics spooky action in a can.  It is acknowledged fact but ignored in understanding the properties of electromagnetism  and magnetic disturbances that relate to the production of photons.  In the experiments with electrolysis the photons might not be observed except there should be resistance of the current in water and that should lead to infrared and heating / release of heat in the process.  That goes down as "conservation of energy"  but does it?  the migration of oxygen and hydrogen in two opposite polarities says there is a problem not resolved. I believe I have resolved it.  That leaves photons completely out of the conservation of energy equations....unnecessary.  different thing not energy and not mass.  The only way you get the electrolysis results is by having a dark code that interferes with bonding energy because of some outer source of energy which can only be an unseen existing source of energy and that turns out to be momentum....the motion of mater relative to the motion of everything else.

Sunday, June 25, 2017

Layers of code ....Not just photons are coded.

photons are not the only thing in the universe that is coded of course. it take mass to interface with photons to actually exist in reality and it takes mass in contact with photons to make them apparent and exist too.
Although photons are pure code that also leads to the conclusion that mass also can be pure code reflexively.  we cannot detect photons or start to measure them in any way with out mater.  We cant detect mater without photons or electro magnetic disturbance energy as per feeling and touch senses. Of course photons are merely light disrupted into space electromagnetic signals and in mass electromagnetic disturbance signals are also photons except we call them dark energy because unlike light in space or though space they are not necessarily visible  but they transmit real code at short distances and longer ones.

Yes the unifying theory that puts the force of gravity and electromagnetism into a predictable relationship happens to be the inverse square outward propertied sphere of radiation.   Radiation is simply the dark electromagnetic disturbance signals of material state masses emerging into an outside vacuum.  It is sort of like light pulsing though a fiber optic cable and then out into a vacuum.  Photons act to signal at a distance then, though they are not going to transmit the original message necessarily they have a negative energy effect in the signal as to drain subatomic particles of energy of momentum. That leads to the radiometer proof of gravity I discovered years ago.

When it comes to the sun, though , that is not the whole story . Although photons radiating from the sun at  various percentages along the electromagnetic spectrum including gamma they do not carry energy and they do not carry any mass.  The Sun loses more energy and mass in the form of actual momentum and that is from the solar wind.  The wind can include any parts of atoms, whole atoms and possibly molecules too. Each individual particle projected by the Sun is actually a miniature rocket having the escape velocity to leave the sun's gravitational field which is amazingly powerful, as I recall some 500 times that of the earth's gravity.  Each of these particle rockets can have the ability to travel straight out of the solar system if not deflected by some planetary magnetic field and these tiny rockets can also be trust forward by the radiation field.  If you are looking for real energy from the Sun it is not the  photons. Photons draw from existing hidden momentum.  The cosmic wind is mass and energy ....that is real mass and energy.  The relationship of the cosmic wind and the radiation sphere "field'  is just the origin being the Sun and some possible trust reactions.  going out into the more distant universe we expect to see huge spherical photon fields and much larger solar wind phenomena than we find in our own solar system.  The bending of light from other than refraction, reflection and diffraction never happens but the solar wind and cosmic rays do react to sources of magnetism/ electro magnetism  and to the coding of the photons because mass is  there. 

Thursday, June 22, 2017

THE SUN COULD ACTUALLY BE FIXED TO A WORM HOLE ...IF YOU BELIEVE SPACE-TIME CAN BE FLOLDED.

The Sun could be fixed to a worm hole portal if ever one of those could exist. As for even bigger news from the Gravity Research Program in Portland Oregon. The Sun may just happen to mark what is an open portal worm hole . The idea that all mater and energy were vested in objects in space at the time of a mythical big bang is just one theory. Recalculating the energy and mass of the sun it might appear to be increasing with timer and not depleting some fixed amount of depos...ited mass and energy from 14 or more billion years ago. At GRP the idea that Stars including our Sun are feeders and not fixed masses then it is entirely possible that a wormhole opens to the sun to feed it constantly. Of course that could lead to later closing of the portal and the mass and energy net declining for the Sun. So If you do believe that space time can be folded to create a worm hole then clearly the Sun can be stationed right at that junction. The idea can be tested . I would look at the Coronal holes in the coronal sphere along the magnetic field lines . At GRP we think a super atomic core of a singe giant element can exist. call it a black hole if you prefer. That's because it would naturally have to discharge large numbers of electrons from the core....well visit GRP for more info

Tuesday, June 20, 2017

updating new laws of physics for the coded universe thesis.

I am refining the New Laws of physics with photons now as pure code neither transmitting energy nor having mass.  the pure code theory leads to an intelligent universe thesis which actually explains a lot that could not be explained before.  There are layers of code and all code is electromagnetism.   That's a new law of nature actually.  This is a substantially different thesis than string theory or holographic  analogy theory.  http://gravityresearchprogram-grp.blogspot.com/  another new law of physics is that mass of any kind is code reader material .

Friday, June 16, 2017

Once you realize that photons are pure code you can help revise and fix physics and astronomy as we now know it.

I cannot do it all myself.  I have the main empirical evidence that requires these revisions happen now and I will move on to proving that where there is code there has to be intelligence.  I can't say that growing into a quartz  crystal as opposed to a diamond crystal takes a lot of intelligence but when intelligence it takes requires coding.  DNA is a completely different story because it is code with layers of code that binds to molecules in cells promoting what could be called even higher levels of code.  It all comes down to electro magnetism at work  and choice properties and levels of light and dark photonic activity as per electro magnetism.  electro magnetism is extreme coding we all know it with the spectrum and the periodic table  and then we have the encyclopedia of molecules and then we get to dna and a library of possible forms life can take.. Layers of code everything is going down to subatomic particles that lose momentum in contact with a particular electro magnetic disturbance.  that loss of momentum can be very elastic because subatomic forces keep negative and positive ions engaged with each other....evaporation is an ionization effect when it comes to photons and so is photo electric effect but none of it is caused by actual energy input to the contrary it is a kind of new relativity of motion slowing.  The speed of light then is acceleration with out out mass and without energy but the effects appear to transform both mass and energy of atoms.  atoms temporarily getting less massive with an electron put in greater motion and atoms also might seem to speed up just because they have electrons that fly off the surface having actually been put in a kind of temporary suspended animation.

Einstein totally missed the point about photons being pure code and that hte photo electric effect is actually all about slowing down electrons from atoms from the general hidden momentum of the whole.

It turns out that the energy of photo electric effect totally comes from hidden momentum of the atoms affected from the whole body of mater. Einstein and others mistakenly figured that energy was being transferred though space and time by photons as well as mass.  All that was incorrect because of my proof going back to the radiometer proof, the Lex Loeb radiometer proof in the new laws of physics published years ago shows that no momentum is imparted with a photon collision . back then I did not realize that also meant no energy was transmitted .  No mass no energy just code and it is code that actually slows things down.  That's the same effect photon have with evaporation on surface water here on earth and elsewhere.  We see what appears to be a collision force like a miniature electron explosion but what it really is is the rest of the mass continuing to move forward and the electrons effected slowing down to a point they actually appear by a new form of relativity to be exploding off the surface when they are really being slowed down .    It all depends on the material as the periodic table meshes with the coding of the electromagnetic spectrum.  A gamma ray can do much more to slow an electron down considerably so its photo electric effect is higher than an xray and higher than visible light as well.  Gamma almost stops the electron in its place it.  The reaction is more like a stick going into a moving bicycle when than it is any kind of energy or force.  Electro magnetism is about proximity . the code relays in solid state mater but when it hits empty space it is still valid code and can go a considerable distance at the speed of light which is constant in space....code can easily have velocity at the same time it has no mass and no energy .  we do it all the time with radio and tv broadcast radiation  and we know its all code but we engineer it as if it is energy in transition and mass as we like it.  It all works out but it is completely wrong.  As the earth passes though the radiation field of the sun at relatively close proximity it gets activated not by being exposed to more energy and gaining mass from photons....no but from a sort of sub atomic evaporation effect because the photons slow down the outer most electrons they can come into contact with. It is hit or miss by probability and within the ranges found of the em spectrum.  Not all photons interact with everything on the periodic table or with combined molecules either.  That variability is one more amazing incite also suggesting the photons are pure code.  It reinforces not just the theory but aids in the proof.   I discussed dimensional expansion in earlier papers that results form photo electric effect but did not realize it was slowing due to code reception nor that the apparent energy comes from the underlying motion of what Newton called an object in motion staying in motion.  Any object in motion out in space with no metric grid to say where it is in relation absolutely to anything else in space can only start to gage it's actual momentum by striking an other object at some other velocity or interacting with photons.  The photon interactions though are not necessarily absolute.   some photon seem to just pass though or ignore or bounce off in reflection.  I still believe reflection is first absorption  and then re-emission.  but now I see all emissions as code.

The earth appears as a tiny dot in space from the surface of the sun. but the Sun is still activiating the eartha nd making it as visible as it would be from the surface.

If you could stand on the surface of the sun and look out and see earth it is a tiny speck in the distance running though the sun's radiation and solar wind. What you see of earth is light from the sun behind you reflected back. The distance from the sun's surface sets the amount of radiation hitting the earth constantly from the sun based on surface area exposed at the rate of the inverse square of the distance from the sun making the constant bath of photons from the sun less intense than where you are standing on the sun's surface. Much less intense. The earth can only interact with as many photons as per the surface area exposed as it orbits the sun. That radiation in total may actually have everything to do with earth's own planetary gravity especially when you dismiss the photo electric effect as energy and put it in the category of what it really is braking the existing momentum of individual electrons on the surface of the earth exposed. It leads to a complete revision of text book astronomy and physics. The exposure of the earth to the fainter radiation of the sun as per the inverse square law at the range of the earth's orbit may actually be photons bending mass per se instead of gravity bending light. Actually I am pretty sure of it now. What a misconception. Ample solar radiation is all about a kind of surface evaporation starting with subatomic particles especially electrons. The force of acceleration on earth is directly related to what turns out to be that loss of energy from momentum and a new creation of greater density because of probability as electrons are removed by this photo electric effect of slowing down . That goes back to my original mischaracterized thesis that gravity was thermodynamic.....which it still is when you see the photo electric effect in the new light.

Wednesday, June 14, 2017

"The Intelligent Universe" is the name of my coming book/ paper on the subject of our coded universe.

\Yes we live in an intelligent universe. It is easy to prove.  Not sure if that proves the existence of God or anything else but it does prove that where there is coded transmission there has to be intelligence.  Coding begins with assigning values to  phenomenology.  we humans often like to use schematic symbols to transmit ideas and messages as code. we assign shapes  values and try to make  the whole process systematic and predictable.  nature's code , having now gone way beyond 'laws of nature" to having a periodic table and an electro magnetic spectrum, DNA and other coding as in different levels of DNA coding when the DNA becomes activated in vitro tells us that we humans did not invent the codes but just happened to discover it and continue to try and decipher it as best we can.      
The way an intelligent universe works maybe for more types and levels of intelligence to exist than we humans want to imagine possible. we want to feel blessed and conceded with our consciousness. the entire universe maybe conscious as much or more than we are.  Atoms know which crystals to join when crystals are forming.  They can avoid becoming part of one crystal and instead become part of another.  plants may grow toward the light but no one thinks that's a form of innate intelligence except for me.    Why would it be intelligence?  It is just reacting.?  No it is reacting in as predictable way  instead of  we could say an "unintelligent way".....I can explain but it might take a whole darn book to do so.  Chemical reactions may not all be intelligent as it might take trillions of trillions times trillions of trillions of reactions for the accident that makes life possible on earth to happen anywhere else in the universe and everywhere else. In a universe with astronomical distances and time then there is plenty of time for all that and more to happen.

FYI Photon Expose'

Where F=MA  or force  equals mass time acceleration for a photon F =0 because F=zero mass x A
which is zero.

Now we do know that the photon has a definite  rate of acceleration .  Problem is that for a photon it is most likely based on non existent metrics.  A  photon has no way to position itself in space until it impacts something of material substance.  The value of A for a photon is probably actually negative. that is because a photon carries no energy and no mass but does carry code that can jolt an electron from it's atomic position by removing energy from its underlying momentum.  Giving a photon thus a negative value for A acceleration then makes perfect sense. The math however is not worth very much.  The periodic table and the elector magnetic spectrum charts  do identify the approximate level of energy removal from momentum with in the range.  electro microscopic images suggest a more hit or miss probability scenario . we are dealing with many photons and many affected electrons in many atoms  and not anything totally absolute.  defining a photon as having only acceleration for its coded message makes perfect sense because we already use the spectrum to send our own coded message including recorded music and voice, pictures and text.   photons serve the same purpose in nature that we humans have harnessed them to use for our own purposes.  

We use radio and tv / satellite broadcasting , wifi  sending a stream of photon radiation as pure code and we are not concerned as much as sending mass or energy when we do it.  The code is sent and usually amplified at a remote location where the signal is  collected and then it is interpreted from code .  Nature uses photons in almost exactly the same manner only to apparently send energy when it is really just acting on remote material interfaces to remove existing energy from outer most electrons until you rev up your photons to xrays and gamma.  Where F is zero you  still have observed acceleration . it can take  photons 8 minutes to travel to mars and another 8 minutes to get a message back.  easy to time and retest.....acceleration is there then but not force.

Sunday, May 28, 2017

gravity and momentum/ acceleration of mass are the same thing.

  1. finally got it. The accelerating properties of gravity come from momentum of any object. the hidden energy of momentum is where the apparent force of gravity comes from. If you could actually bring the earth to a stop relative to everything else it would have no gravity. Evaporation if not due to "boiling" is due to momentum energy release. the trick then is proximal verses distant em codes. Einstein figured some of it out so did newton but they both got the photons wrong. 
  2. something has to interact to know there is gravity but now I can develop a photon test to tell you exactly how much the "force" of gravity on any body. once I have the instrument it will blow everything in physics. Maybe light from Venus verses Mars has a signature...but not all light even in a given wavelength range. the instrument might already sort of exist without the necessary calibration something has to interact to know there is gravity but now I can develop a photon test to tell you exactly how much the "force" of gravity on any body. once I have the instrument it will blow everything in physics. Maybe light from Venus verses Mars has a signature...but not all light even in a given wavelength range. the instrument might already sort of exist without the necessary calibration
3  think about how you experience gravity or measure it.  That is key to understanding what it is. the dark energy of momentum as a reserve of energy in motion has absolutely no attributes until photons interact at one level.  you can have a space ship traveling at 5 billion meters per second and if nothing it outside of it to measure meters it might as well seem as if it is standing still.  if it hits a cloud of gas at that rate it should explode in vapor or even be a nuclear reaction .  if an atom's subatomic particles are activated by electro magnetism they can sense the gravity of that momentum in proximity and maybe even at a distance.....the way to meter gravity properties with photon is my next area of research.  a photon bares attribute of where it was generated. say it came from an electric lightbulb can tell you what kind of light bulb created it.  that photon might be somewhat different than the same one generated by the corona of the sun  or maybe there is some difference.  the spectrum is a giant range between classifications.  lots of room for lots of coded information.

Wednesday, May 17, 2017

add more and more diverse frames of reference and time is much less relative and variable.

How to completely undermine Einstein: " In the theory of relativity, time dilation is a difference of elapsed time between two events as measured by observers either moving relative to each other or differently situated from a gravitational mass or masses.
A clock at rest with respect to one observer may be measured to tick at a different rate when compared to a second observer's clock. This effect arises neither from technical aspects of the clocks nor from the propagation t...ime of signals, but from the nature of spacetime."
Read it carefully. It says that time dilation is the elapsed time between TWO events. Just two...two positions only. You see if you add more than two frames of reference the whole theory collapses. The universe is vast and is actually sort of ah ...three dimensional. So just add a third frame of reference moving towards the other two and then past them then space time has a different warping shape. keep adding more moving frames for reference at large numbers of relative velocities and time and space are going to seem much more universal and the same. Its no wonder then that cosmic expansion and the big bang theory appeals to relativists because they can take their analogies and fit in that way more perfectly.