Skip to main content

gravity and momentum/ acceleration of mass are the same thing.

  1. finally got it. The accelerating properties of gravity come from momentum of any object. the hidden energy of momentum is where the apparent force of gravity comes from. If you could actually bring the earth to a stop relative to everything else it would have no gravity. Evaporation if not due to "boiling" is due to momentum energy release. the trick then is proximal verses distant em codes. Einstein figured some of it out so did newton but they both got the photons wrong. 
  2. something has to interact to know there is gravity but now I can develop a photon test to tell you exactly how much the "force" of gravity on any body. once I have the instrument it will blow everything in physics. Maybe light from Venus verses Mars has a signature...but not all light even in a given wavelength range. the instrument might already sort of exist without the necessary calibration something has to interact to know there is gravity but now I can develop a photon test to tell you exactly how much the "force" of gravity on any body. once I have the instrument it will blow everything in physics. Maybe light from Venus verses Mars has a signature...but not all light even in a given wavelength range. the instrument might already sort of exist without the necessary calibration
3  think about how you experience gravity or measure it.  That is key to understanding what it is. the dark energy of momentum as a reserve of energy in motion has absolutely no attributes until photons interact at one level.  you can have a space ship traveling at 5 billion meters per second and if nothing it outside of it to measure meters it might as well seem as if it is standing still.  if it hits a cloud of gas at that rate it should explode in vapor or even be a nuclear reaction .  if an atom's subatomic particles are activated by electro magnetism they can sense the gravity of that momentum in proximity and maybe even at a distance.....the way to meter gravity properties with photon is my next area of research.  a photon bares attribute of where it was generated. say it came from an electric lightbulb can tell you what kind of light bulb created it.  that photon might be somewhat different than the same one generated by the corona of the sun  or maybe there is some difference.  the spectrum is a giant range between classifications.  lots of room for lots of coded information.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Space Time is Nonsense in a universe where space has no actual metric properties. Einstein Got it Wrong . Super Relativity by Lex Loeb resolves the problem.

You have to read a lot of my previous posts to understand my empirical discoveries.  Figuring you have I will now quickly explain how mass relates to gravity and probably electromagnetic properties of mater too. Newton clearly stated that object in motion stay in motion but never really explained , relative, to everything else in the universe , as a marker or a metric in space, how any object 'stays at rest.'   Relative to all  other objects moving in space or even photons at the speed of light,  Everything is actually in motion . Nothing is at rest. Well of course you know that intuitively.  The whole mental experiment by Einstein about frames of reference is about things being in motion relative to each other and that also includes his diversion into space and time and space time. Object in space regardless of size or whether they are mater or photons or something else that has physical subatomic particles of any sort or size is that they only can register against each

Assuming em drive propulsion is a real phenomenon...assuming....you should be able to instantly propell your microwave oven into orbit after unplugging it.

My new understanding of light and the spectrum of light as being pure code and not transmitting energy nor mass perfectly supports the observation that seem to say an em drive engine is possible.    That's because you create and send a photon to transmit information  which we all know are the "wavelength / frequency" for each.  at opposite ends of the spectrum you should then have pure wavelength with no frequency and pure frequency with no wavelength at the other end of the spectrum.  What is pure frequency? what is pure wavelength.  these are both properties expressed as analogies.  at one end of the spectrum I would guess you have pure acceleration and at the other  negative acceleration ?   the basic positive photon just finds energy of existing momentum of mater and subatomic particles and deploys it.  It becomes a frames of reference mater when a gamma ray seems to activate a sub atomic particle when it really is just deactivating it essentially slowing it down rela

Proving Electrons Have No Mass as they are really code processors that allows them to signal properties mass only

The massless electron is definite now. The best way to explain the new science is to use the word either . but it is not either that covers the entire universe it is a proton nucleus either that only covers the extent of electron attraction / counter balancing. electrons are as mass free as photons how ever they do have your basic thermodynamic properties. As photons are pure code electrons are electrons are acting more like computers. They process photonic code. The next step will totally blow away physics as we now know it. Not sure if relativity suffers yet...   I am still resolving the mass free electron thesis.   Electrons have no mass . They are essentially code processors that signal properties of mass in the pervasive sea of electromagnetism that pervades the universe.  I now know that there is a sort of electro magnetic weather though out the entire universe...it  blips and pulses and has fronts just like weather systems. electrons are the intersection of mater and elect