Skip to main content

FYI Photon Expose'

Where F=MA  or force  equals mass time acceleration for a photon F =0 because F=zero mass x A
which is zero.

Now we do know that the photon has a definite  rate of acceleration .  Problem is that for a photon it is most likely based on non existent metrics.  A  photon has no way to position itself in space until it impacts something of material substance.  The value of A for a photon is probably actually negative. that is because a photon carries no energy and no mass but does carry code that can jolt an electron from it's atomic position by removing energy from its underlying momentum.  Giving a photon thus a negative value for A acceleration then makes perfect sense. The math however is not worth very much.  The periodic table and the elector magnetic spectrum charts  do identify the approximate level of energy removal from momentum with in the range.  electro microscopic images suggest a more hit or miss probability scenario . we are dealing with many photons and many affected electrons in many atoms  and not anything totally absolute.  defining a photon as having only acceleration for its coded message makes perfect sense because we already use the spectrum to send our own coded message including recorded music and voice, pictures and text.   photons serve the same purpose in nature that we humans have harnessed them to use for our own purposes.  

We use radio and tv / satellite broadcasting , wifi  sending a stream of photon radiation as pure code and we are not concerned as much as sending mass or energy when we do it.  The code is sent and usually amplified at a remote location where the signal is  collected and then it is interpreted from code .  Nature uses photons in almost exactly the same manner only to apparently send energy when it is really just acting on remote material interfaces to remove existing energy from outer most electrons until you rev up your photons to xrays and gamma.  Where F is zero you  still have observed acceleration . it can take  photons 8 minutes to travel to mars and another 8 minutes to get a message back.  easy to time and retest.....acceleration is there then but not force.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Space Time is Nonsense in a universe where space has no actual metric properties. Einstein Got it Wrong . Super Relativity by Lex Loeb resolves the problem.

You have to read a lot of my previous posts to understand my empirical discoveries.  Figuring you have I will now quickly explain how mass relates to gravity and probably electromagnetic properties of mater too. Newton clearly stated that object in motion stay in motion but never really explained , relative, to everything else in the universe , as a marker or a metric in space, how any object 'stays at rest.'   Relative to all  other objects moving in space or even photons at the speed of light,  Everything is actually in motion . Nothing is at rest. Well of course you know that intuitively.  The whole mental experiment by Einstein about frames of reference is about things being in motion relative to each other and that also includes his diversion into space and time and space time. Object in space regardless of size or whether they are mater or photons or something else that has physical subatomic particles of any sort or size is that they only can register against each
Post a Comment
Read more

Assuming em drive propulsion is a real phenomenon...assuming....you should be able to instantly propell your microwave oven into orbit after unplugging it.

My new understanding of light and the spectrum of light as being pure code and not transmitting energy nor mass perfectly supports the observation that seem to say an em drive engine is possible.    That's because you create and send a photon to transmit information  which we all know are the "wavelength / frequency" for each.  at opposite ends of the spectrum you should then have pure wavelength with no frequency and pure frequency with no wavelength at the other end of the spectrum.  What is pure frequency? what is pure wavelength.  these are both properties expressed as analogies.  at one end of the spectrum I would guess you have pure acceleration and at the other  negative acceleration ?   the basic positive photon just finds energy of existing momentum of mater and subatomic particles and deploys it.  It becomes a frames of reference mater when a gamma ray seems to activate a sub atomic particle when it really is just deactivating it essentially slowing it down rela
Post a Comment
Read more

Proving Electrons Have No Mass as they are really code processors that allows them to signal properties mass only

The massless electron is definite now. The best way to explain the new science is to use the word either . but it is not either that covers the entire universe it is a proton nucleus either that only covers the extent of electron attraction / counter balancing. electrons are as mass free as photons how ever they do have your basic thermodynamic properties. As photons are pure code electrons are electrons are acting more like computers. They process photonic code. The next step will totally blow away physics as we now know it. Not sure if relativity suffers yet...   I am still resolving the mass free electron thesis.   Electrons have no mass . They are essentially code processors that signal properties of mass in the pervasive sea of electromagnetism that pervades the universe.  I now know that there is a sort of electro magnetic weather though out the entire universe...it  blips and pulses and has fronts just like weather systems. electrons are the intersection of mater and elect
Post a Comment
Read more