Skip to main content

Space Time is Nonsense in a universe where space has no actual metric properties. Einstein Got it Wrong . Super Relativity by Lex Loeb resolves the problem.

You have to read a lot of my previous posts to understand my empirical discoveries.  Figuring you have I will now quickly explain how mass relates to gravity and probably electromagnetic properties of mater too. Newton clearly stated that object in motion stay in motion but never really explained , relative, to everything else in the universe , as a marker or a metric in space, how any object 'stays at rest.'  

Relative to all  other objects moving in space or even photons at the speed of light,  Everything is actually in motion . Nothing is at rest.

Well of course you know that intuitively.  The whole mental experiment by Einstein about frames of reference is about things being in motion relative to each other and that also includes his diversion into space and time and space time.

Object in space regardless of size or whether they are mater or photons or something else that has physical subatomic particles of any sort or size is that they only can register against each other in some form of collision.    We can't even see without photons hitting our retinas.  There is no energy without some kind of collision or friction. There is also no perception of mass either.

so what is perception?  do the planets around the sun 'perceive' the existence of the sun because of tidal forces and their gravitational orbits locked into the sun's gravity?    Maybe  but does not actually mater.  To some degree gravity is at least a kind of friction  , Though it can also be used to speed up object with a slingshot effect as observed with comets it mostly leads to collisions of objects and to their slowing down in capture orbits.  That's like contactless sports.

Where super relativity fixes the problem ditching general relativity and special relativity is just  understanding that gravity corresponds to a loss of underlying momentum which is redefined as  the potential to collide and vaporize on impact.   Einstein was certain that gravity was slowing down time.  Its actually not doing anything of the sort but probably the exact opposite. speeding up time....It is slowing down velocity.  some cosmic ray coming to the earth with some bit of plasma  may add to the mass of the earth once captured by the earth's magnetic field or just by striking the earth and getting absorbed into the general mass of the planet.   That tiny bit of plasma/ mass is no longer charging though the universe at relative super high velocity.  It expends the energy it has when being absorbed by creating a tiny hole in the earth's material body.  That is slowing down.   Photons do not behave that way . Not at all they have no properties of mass but they actually slow down subatomic particles as per the bowling ball in the analogy falling out the back window of a car when it stops but the car keeps moving ahead.  Once you get it then you can't go back to special relativity or to general relativity.   Einstein got some things right . he was on track with frames of reference but he allowed geometry to model space which is impossible.

If you want proof of super relativity it is easy now to find many examples.  What does all of this do to black hole theology? I can joke that it really just sends them down the drain...that's a physics joke by the way.

The "perception of gravity " is key.  Mass can perceive it and react with tidal forces or orbital behavior or apparent acceleration.  perception of gravity is still a frames of reference problem just not one where photons have mass and not one where time warps because space has metric properties.

 As for metrics in space....yes we can't find metrics in space but we can impose them.     The second form of super relativity is that all mass and photons are coded according to the spectrum and the periodic table, frequency and wavelength though become properties of mass not of the photons that interact as coding catalysts as photons have neither mass nor do they transmit 'energy'.    You get a star on your forehead now if you understand what I am saying but since I am never going to be a professor you won't be graded.
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Proving Electrons Have No Mass as they are really code processors that allows them to signal properties mass only

The massless electron is definite now. The best way to explain the new science is to use the word either . but it is not either that covers the entire universe it is a proton nucleus either that only covers the extent of electron attraction / counter balancing. electrons are as mass free as photons how ever they do have your basic thermodynamic properties. As photons are pure code electrons are electrons are acting more like computers. They process photonic code. The next step will totally blow away physics as we now know it. Not sure if relativity suffers yet...

  I am still resolving the mass free electron thesis.   Electrons have no mass . They are essentially code processors that signal properties of mass in the pervasive sea of electromagnetism that pervades the universe.  I now know that there is a sort of electro magnetic weather though out the entire universe...it  blips and pulses and has fronts just like weather systems. electrons are the intersection of mater and electro…

How Photons lead to Lex Loeb's "Super Relativity"