Skip to main content

What if the speed of light constant is wrong and light can travel instantly under some circumstances from end to end of the entire cosmos?

The speed of light constant actually might not be!  It maybe possible for light to travel instantly . The speed of light constant is the measured rate it travels in a vacuum   and then what if it does not travel in a vacuum?  Yes I am serious because so called quantum mechanics experiments say that particles can be in more than one place at the same time.  We can measure light speed in the time it takes from one point in or beyond or solar system and predict it exactly but our solar system is not the greater universe and  we still actually can't measure light we don't find reflected off an object or that we have generated ourselves...…….when light comes out of the sun or a distant sun or galaxy we really don't know it's point to time origins.  we did not create it so we can only estimate it and we cannot tag it unless we send it at a signature wavelength/frequency so of course I am right.  But I have to prove that although we are certain it takes x number of minutes to come from the sun  it has to vary from the point on the sun's surface or interior from where it originates but that slows it down. We would assume.  but reflexivity says quite the opposite. We could receive light from the sun much faster even instantly from it's point of origin from the sun.  If it is possible to que up light it is possible to do the impossible.  It is even possible we don't fully understand light. I already dismiss light as pure code and not particular and zero mass even negative mass the way it behaves on impact with mater  I also found it has no energy...carries no energy but rather finds it where it lands.  Now realizing that the speed of light might be yet another frames of reference illusion I can see something entirely new coming and have empirical evidence to support it.  working on it. yet you know soon....and you wonder how I can prove and disprove the new and old ….it could be the doppler red shift illusion  actually.  I already put that in the refraction category of phenomena but I might be able to tweak it  by understanding  the doppler effect for what it is interference.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Space Time is Nonsense in a universe where space has no actual metric properties. Einstein Got it Wrong . Super Relativity by Lex Loeb resolves the problem.

You have to read a lot of my previous posts to understand my empirical discoveries.  Figuring you have I will now quickly explain how mass relates to gravity and probably electromagnetic properties of mater too. Newton clearly stated that object in motion stay in motion but never really explained , relative, to everything else in the universe , as a marker or a metric in space, how any object 'stays at rest.'   Relative to all  other objects moving in space or even photons at the speed of light,  Everything is actually in motion . Nothing is at rest. Well of course you know that intuitively.  The whole mental experiment by Einstein about frames of reference is about things being in motion relative to each other and that also includes his diversion into space and time and space time. Object in space regardless of size or whether they are mater or photons or something else that has physical subatomic particles of any sort or size is that they only can register against each

Assuming em drive propulsion is a real phenomenon...assuming....you should be able to instantly propell your microwave oven into orbit after unplugging it.

My new understanding of light and the spectrum of light as being pure code and not transmitting energy nor mass perfectly supports the observation that seem to say an em drive engine is possible.    That's because you create and send a photon to transmit information  which we all know are the "wavelength / frequency" for each.  at opposite ends of the spectrum you should then have pure wavelength with no frequency and pure frequency with no wavelength at the other end of the spectrum.  What is pure frequency? what is pure wavelength.  these are both properties expressed as analogies.  at one end of the spectrum I would guess you have pure acceleration and at the other  negative acceleration ?   the basic positive photon just finds energy of existing momentum of mater and subatomic particles and deploys it.  It becomes a frames of reference mater when a gamma ray seems to activate a sub atomic particle when it really is just deactivating it essentially slowing it down rela

Proving Electrons Have No Mass as they are really code processors that allows them to signal properties mass only

The massless electron is definite now. The best way to explain the new science is to use the word either . but it is not either that covers the entire universe it is a proton nucleus either that only covers the extent of electron attraction / counter balancing. electrons are as mass free as photons how ever they do have your basic thermodynamic properties. As photons are pure code electrons are electrons are acting more like computers. They process photonic code. The next step will totally blow away physics as we now know it. Not sure if relativity suffers yet...   I am still resolving the mass free electron thesis.   Electrons have no mass . They are essentially code processors that signal properties of mass in the pervasive sea of electromagnetism that pervades the universe.  I now know that there is a sort of electro magnetic weather though out the entire universe...it  blips and pulses and has fronts just like weather systems. electrons are the intersection of mater and elect