Skip to main content

Einstein's Thought Experiment has some major defects including the space traveling dude who aquires enough kinetic energy of motion to blow up the earth on his speedy return.

I discovered a major mistake in Einstein's relativity today while watching nuts fall out of trees. You have Charlton Hesston take off in a space ship that reaches the speed of light on a ten year journey in which time his space ship crashes back into earth in the era when it is the planet of the apes and Obama is still president 100,000 years from now and well there is a big problem with that. Chariton Hesston is going at the speed of light and his body is absorbing all of t...his energy of motion the type that Einstein caused the space craft moving at the speed of light to have a black hole following in its wake. Well then it takes a long time once reaching the speed of light and as much energy as it took to get the space ship and contents to the speed of light or approaching it. To slow down the space ship would take at least as long as it took to speed up or would cause a massive impact with anything it collided with. Hesston's body would have all of this dark energy in it . If like in the movie the space ship just comes in for a landing after powering down from the speed of light Hesston would have so much energy in his body that the whole earth would explode the second he set foot on it. bye bye planet of the apes. No really. Did you know that slowing down that speed of light space craft in Einstein's theory could cause Hesston to age really fast too according to the same theory? He could be 100,000 years old just form slowing down. Ok I have not done those numbers yet but the Einstein thought experiment is absurd and it is wrong

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Space Time is Nonsense in a universe where space has no actual metric properties. Einstein Got it Wrong . Super Relativity by Lex Loeb resolves the problem.

You have to read a lot of my previous posts to understand my empirical discoveries.  Figuring you have I will now quickly explain how mass relates to gravity and probably electromagnetic properties of mater too. Newton clearly stated that object in motion stay in motion but never really explained , relative, to everything else in the universe , as a marker or a metric in space, how any object 'stays at rest.'   Relative to all  other objects moving in space or even photons at the speed of light,  Everything is actually in motion . Nothing is at rest. Well of course you know that intuitively.  The whole mental experiment by Einstein about frames of reference is about things being in motion relative to each other and that also includes his diversion into space and time and space time. Object in space regardless of size or whether they are mater or photons or something else that has physical subatomic particles of any sort or size is that they only can register against each

Assuming em drive propulsion is a real phenomenon...assuming....you should be able to instantly propell your microwave oven into orbit after unplugging it.

My new understanding of light and the spectrum of light as being pure code and not transmitting energy nor mass perfectly supports the observation that seem to say an em drive engine is possible.    That's because you create and send a photon to transmit information  which we all know are the "wavelength / frequency" for each.  at opposite ends of the spectrum you should then have pure wavelength with no frequency and pure frequency with no wavelength at the other end of the spectrum.  What is pure frequency? what is pure wavelength.  these are both properties expressed as analogies.  at one end of the spectrum I would guess you have pure acceleration and at the other  negative acceleration ?   the basic positive photon just finds energy of existing momentum of mater and subatomic particles and deploys it.  It becomes a frames of reference mater when a gamma ray seems to activate a sub atomic particle when it really is just deactivating it essentially slowing it down rela

Proving Electrons Have No Mass as they are really code processors that allows them to signal properties mass only

The massless electron is definite now. The best way to explain the new science is to use the word either . but it is not either that covers the entire universe it is a proton nucleus either that only covers the extent of electron attraction / counter balancing. electrons are as mass free as photons how ever they do have your basic thermodynamic properties. As photons are pure code electrons are electrons are acting more like computers. They process photonic code. The next step will totally blow away physics as we now know it. Not sure if relativity suffers yet...   I am still resolving the mass free electron thesis.   Electrons have no mass . They are essentially code processors that signal properties of mass in the pervasive sea of electromagnetism that pervades the universe.  I now know that there is a sort of electro magnetic weather though out the entire universe...it  blips and pulses and has fronts just like weather systems. electrons are the intersection of mater and elect